Search:

second American Revolution theonomy federal reserve

Second American Revolution: Rousas John Rushdoony (1 of 9)

John Rushdoony Video Page
John Rushdoony Video Page John Rushdoony Video Page
John Rushdoony Video Page

I am glad you used that word: "covenant." Covenantal thinking has all but disappeared. That's why in my Systematic Theology, I gave it particular space, because it is foundational. The Bible is divided by two covenants, really one Covenant, the original renewed again and again, in the New Testament from a nation to the Church, the nation symbolized by twelve tribes, twelve Apostles now in the church, as the new Israel of God. Paul refers to the Church in Galatians 6:6 as the new Israel of God. This means that we have a duty. We have to occupy the whole world. The Great Commission is to make disciples of all nations. To bring them all into the fold together with all their peoples because Christ is the ordained King of all creation. We have a magnificent calling. I don't believe God programmed us for defeat.I know that some of my premillennial friends in the ministry feel a little bit out of sorts because of our stress on victory. They say, "It has an unfortunate appeal for our people. They don't like to be losers. As amils or premils, they feel that they are on the losing side. And you talk about victory and it has a real tug on their heart-strings. They like the idea." And they should. I believe that the impulse in all their being is God-given. We are a people called to victory not defeat. "This is the victory," the Apostle John tells us, "even our faith."

Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: January 15, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Author: jcr4runner

Length: 02:15
Rating: 3.37
Views: 3403


Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

FeileadhMor (April 16, 2008 at 5:48 pm)
This was great, thanks.
AnonymousBChurch (April 15, 2008 at 1:05 am)
jcr4runner, they know they are using the term "fascist" incorrectly, and they don't care anymore than the right wingers care about using the term "liberal" and "communist" and "socialist" incorrectly. It's a smear, not a descriptive term. Partisans are the biggest liars on the planet.
MedicineWarrior (February 27, 2008 at 2:30 pm)
Deal. I'll watch the rest of the clips and see what I think.
jcr4runner (February 25, 2008 at 11:11 pm)
We interviewed most of the figures of the CR movement in this video series. If you can find a contradiction in how I have stated it here, let me know.The problem is that people have attacked CR without really understanding its presuppositions, arguments and conclusions.
MedicineWarrior (February 25, 2008 at 7:29 pm)
I would agree with this- but it is worth noting that not all people that espouse reconstructionism think that way. A lot of what we know as the Christian/right/evangelical/republican movement have crossed the line from being a selfless minority to a political power bloc of domination though superior firepower.
MedicineWarrior (February 25, 2008 at 7:26 pm)
I don't have a problem with things the way you have stated them here. I don't think Christians should withdraw from civic engagement either, but that they should be VERY careful not to exceed the bounds of Christian ethics as laid out by Jesus' teachings like in the Sermon on The Mount.
jcr4runner (February 24, 2008 at 3:30 pm)
Whether or not a nation had Christian foundations -- or to what extent in America's case -- is moot.Brutal communist dictatorships such as Cuba need freedom for Christians to preach the Gospel and reform the culture according to biblical principles in the civil sphere.Dominion doesn't mean domination -- it means having a position of authority and rule. It doesn't even have to be the dominant influence. Godly social change always comes from a dedicated selfless minority.
jcr4runner (February 24, 2008 at 3:26 pm)
Absolutely, the CHURCH should not interfere in the spheres of government that it was not called to be in authority over.What you are not saying is whether CHRISTIANS ought to be involved in business, civil government, the military, education, mass media, etc.Extreme forms of pietism have said that we ought to withdraw from "worldly" affairs.Other Christians see these these as necessary evils.Christian Reconstruction sees each as an institution ordained by God that needs reform.
MedicineWarrior (February 23, 2008 at 10:20 pm)
I see. Well philosophically I am opposed to "dominionist theology" and I am a preterist or amillennialist. I have some complex reasoning for those positions which would take up more space than is available here. That doesn't mean we aren't Christian brothers. I do have some clips entitled "Myth of a Christian Nation" out there btw. Blessings upon thee.
MedicineWarrior (February 23, 2008 at 10:12 pm)
My thoughts on the proper role of the Church in civic affairs is to BE the Church. That's a full time job. When the Church knowingly and willfully participates with the "world" in business affairs, politics, warfare etc., it ends up playing the world's game and usually on the world's terms, which then makes it "worldly" by default. Jesus spoke of his Kingdom not being "of this world" although it is "in" the world. I'm curious why we should want to try and rework that. Blessings upon you.

Rousas J. Rushdoony Video Page © 2007 All Rights Reserved.