|
chicky123sb (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
im angrymy messenger info is in my youtube profile! MSG me on M.S.N! XN
00148627 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
r heart heart N
azjunglist05 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
That's a slippery slope right there. First of all, Ron Paul would be considered a Libertarian on most of his views. He believes that people should have the freedom to do as they please so long as it does not infringe on others personal freedoms. So since slavery forces people into a submissive state, Ron Paul would not allow any state to grossly cause any such injustices to an individuals freedom. Please, make your arguments logical.
procommenter (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
Obama's a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in Manhattan whose founder, nonogenarian David Rockefeller [grandson of John D. Rockefeller, of Standard Oil {1839-1937}], has stated that the goal of C.F.R. is to create a 1-world govt. McCain, Cheney, the Clintons & Bushes are members of C.F.R. & ascribe to Rockefeller's philosophy.
lookingforghosts (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
Let hear ya say HELL YEAH!!!
000stryke3000 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
5 S☆ars
MrZaborskii (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
This leaves it open to debate, which, I believe, is exactly what the Founding Fathers wanted. Because I believe--and I don't know how many other people watching this video believe this--but I believe that this nation was "conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." I believe this nation was created free.
MrZaborskii (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
You're a Federalist. That's clear. And I don't hold it against you. I'll need to look it up to see exactly who, but a lot of great minds were Federalists. The same goes for the Democratic-Republicans. Apparently Ron Paul is more Democratic-Republican. The Constitution doesn't help much here actually..."The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Amendment 10
MrZaborskii (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
Perhaps the slaves and the people have those rights, but then again, that's the debate between Federalists and--I think-- Democratic-Republicans that goes WAY back in time; whether the states aught to have more rights or the Federal government. That goes back to Jefferson, Madison and Washington. That's one of the debates that formed our Constitution!
MarkDouglasC (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
None. I never said they would. Dr Paul is anti slavery. But if a state decided to enact slavery -- he thinks no one has a right to use force to stop that. I think a lot of people have a right to use force to stop it - including the slaves themselves. |
