|
KRISisLOST (August 30, 2008 at 1:47 pm)
mfrantom how much do they pay you for this?nice vid- fuck the NWO
jamartellxiv (August 18, 2008 at 2:43 am)
"Your theories..." I don't think you know what my theories are. You'd be hard pressed to find an instance of me saying that this was an "inside job." I personally think that that has been one of the gravest errors on the part of the 9/11 truth movement. There IS a cover up, however that could be for any number of reasons. The investigations that we've had have been totally compromised. Watch my video with Dana Perino and name ONE thing I got wrong.
mfrantom (August 18, 2008 at 1:38 am)
As for your friend, its embarassing to have a soldiers that support your theories. Im glad that none I serve with believe any of that crap.
mfrantom (August 18, 2008 at 1:36 am)
We might not like it, but it happens. There are certain things that we will never know. Thats just how it goes. Most of it boils down to national security. In no way would I expect our government to let us in on everything.
jamartellxiv (August 18, 2008 at 12:44 am)
4. He is a friend of mine and asked to be in the video.5. Perhaps you are not wrong, however, I do not agree with you. Attending Bilderberg is a violation of the Logan act and no, I don't think that "secret meetings" should simply come with having power. This government was meant to be transparent and it is anything but.
jamartellxiv (August 18, 2008 at 12:43 am)
1. When you have organizations, which bring together the most influential people in power from around the world, who meet in secret, who try as much as they can to keep knowledge of the event quiet, and then their policies become policy, in fact, in the world, then you start to, surely, ask very serious questions. I'm sorry if you don't agree, but if you don't, then don't watch my stuff.2.fine.3. You were not there and can't see our hands. She took it away when I said 9/11.
mfrantom (August 18, 2008 at 12:31 am)
4. what is the point of having a soldier in the video. is that supposed to had some validity?5. no, im not wrong. i am stating opinion and what i see with my own eyes in your video
mfrantom (August 18, 2008 at 12:30 am)
1 Once again, if it is a "secret meeting" she is not going to tell you. Why would she? Our leaders do things that we will never know about. That comes with the power. 2.I believe you about the article, but that doesnt change anything. 3.I just watched that part 4 times. It seems obvious that she was already walking and looking at the other lady when you brought up the 9/11 families. Even if she was looking at you, she was probably tired of hearing your nonsense and knew there was more.
jamartellxiv (August 17, 2008 at 11:27 pm)
1. Even if she wasn't there she lied when she said she didn't know what it is.2. Why don't you read the cited article?3. You can't see it on camera, but she was looking right at me, and we were shaking hands, and she took her hand away after I said "Do you support the 9/11 families..."4. You are WRONG and don't know what you're talking about.
mfrantom (August 17, 2008 at 11:20 pm)
If she was in a "secret meeting", why would she tell some punk kid about it? the news article "proving" she was there, simply asked the question if she was there. She didnt walk away when the 9/11 question came up, she was already walking away. Im not a Clinton supporter at all, in fact I cant stand her, but you people are really stretching. |
