PirateShipEarth (July 24, 2008 at 7:15 pm)

It was also lead to eventual world peace, sustained environmental efforts, and higher standards of living for the average person in the world.

PirateShipEarth (July 24, 2008 at 7:14 pm)

So, what exactly is your point? Should we fear a world government? Or do we fear the people making happen behind the scenes? Or both? Are these groups of wealthy elite any more dangerous than the "elected", who by the way, end up in political office with less than 20% of potential voters even voting in the elction. There will be a world government some day, its our civilization's natural 'next step'.

uxneey (July 20, 2008 at 10:40 pm)

Ronson also agrees with "conspiracy theorists" that Bilderberg are secretive, powerful, that many of them see themselves as a shadowy cabal out to rule the world, if not influence world events and that they are "headhunters" who bribe politicians.Ronson also admits they are globalists and committed to building a "New World Order" and that they regard (elected) politicians as an obstacle.So where exactly are the so called "conspiracy theorists" wrong?

uxneey (July 20, 2008 at 10:30 pm)

CNN should have had interviewed real experts on the Bilderbergers like Jim Tucker or Daniel Estulin instead of the self contradicting Jon Ronson who denigrates so called conspiracy theorists (ct)on the one hand yet confirms their suspicions on the other.Ronson concedes part of the ct argument right out of the gate saying "yes and no" when asked if Bilderberg are a shadowy cabal that rule the world.

Weedtopia88 (July 20, 2008 at 8:21 pm)

good vid 2 thumb up