|
housechores (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
That a**hole would not play his clip. Remember the major media has been owned by only a handful of individuals. After Youtube/internet in general becomes censored, where will we get accurate information? That's a serious question.
Susieshepherd (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
Not to be political, but I never thought about 9-11 being an inside job til Palin opened her mouth to Gibson in a non-answer talking about "those extreme Islamics who are hell bent on destroying us" (same rhetoric Bush gave in 2001). At that moment I realized the whole thing was a sham & I started to investigate everything. Thx for posting
Gooneygoogoo79 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
Go look up "911 squibs" Squibs are horizontal ejections of debris from a building caused by explosions in a controlled demolition.Go take a look.
codernur (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
You can see that the news media is part of the cover-up.
Xeretza (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
I guess my 2 year old cousin is smarter than NIST since NIST says there was no Demolition r they joking ? - yes they are.
hopeintruth (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
130 + Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials.428 + Engineers and Architects.120 + Pilots and Aviation Professionals.260+ Professors .Say 911 = inside job !!patriotsquestion911
guitaristguy20 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
hehe , you mean payed off.
CLINTSZAF (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
I'm not sure why people just assume you'd find explosives that were meant to be hidden.. My walls at work or my home for that matter, could be filled with explosives!! How would I ever know, I don't often look inside at the under-infrastructure of these bldgs.. and there are numerous reports of explosions by eyewitnesses on scene.. compilation vids right here on YouTube if you're really interested
Franko94 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
ok thanks ill check those vids out
Wakeymedia2 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
Hello Franko94; it is now essential that you see a documentary film entitled "ZERO : An Investigation Into 9/11". And then another film entitled "Improbable Collapse".If you can look at the straight-down, near free-fall speed "collapse" of a 47 storey sky-scraper and actually believe that it "collapsed" in this way because it was damaged and on fire then I think that even you must realise that you are stretching credulity beyond breaking point.Unless you have new laws of physics ofcourse. |