|
TheTruthVibrations (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
what a brilliant perspective.
fr000tch (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
4:49 > interesting that they demolish the Deutsch Bank tower "beam by beam", and why not by controlled demolition? Afraid that it would look too much alike towers 1,2 & 7?
misternylon (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
Slavery, Cuba, Vietnam, JFK, Monroe, Clinton, Watergate, Oliver North, Iraq, 9-11....THE MOON!! people have had enough of the shit from the most evil government on the planet, fuck BU$H and his masonic secret cult of power hungry goons. Trillions of dollars and millions of lives cant be wrong. So many bullets in AmeriKKKa but not one has got BU$H yet. Do us all a favour and kill him.
djhbv23 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
did you actually spend time putting these videos together. what a loser. im sure your gonna say its about trying to get the truth out there but your just trying to get attention. no one gives a shit. whats done is done.
BeccaShakur (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
You mean covered up, just like JFK's death
WTC7WasPulled (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
I challenge anyone to look at the latest explanation from NIST about WTC 7. It is so laughable that you'd think its a joke but they actually said that one column collapsed from heat and made the whole thing come down at free fall speed. As crazy as that sounds thats what they came up with.NIST has no legs left to stand on and they are collapsing.
internetdv8 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
the building fell like a stack of dominos because that was how it was built 'in stages'.the entire building doesn't need to similtaneously fail, just re-distribute the load until it can take no more & the did just that.if it were a conspiracy then why are the remains of steel beams twisted? - if it were really a cover-up & explosions then that does not support your theory.
internetdv8 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
The force of the collapse at the tower that was struck at the higher floors was about a million pounds or more of force & 2 million in the case of the south tower & all that energy coming down was obviously more than enough power to make both structures give way.the comment about the inner columns being one constant solid structure is just wrong, can you tell me when was the last time you've seen a single piece of steel thats 110 stories high?.
sstearns34 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
The core is solid, like a tree. how do you explain the core imploding? I've seen trees burn, never seen one implode. And trees are made of a substance slightly more flammable than steel.
sstearns34 (December 31, 1969 at 11:59 pm)
NIST was forced to retract their statement that 1/3 of the building was destroyed by debris. Also, if there's a steel core beneath the section that collapses, even IF that core is not strong en ough to support the collapsing section, its going to give MORE resistance than air. Unless you think steel = air. |
